<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Defense Review - Latest Comments in Chinese Armor-Piercing (AP) Sniper Rounds and XSAPI Body Armor</title><link>http://defensereview.disqus.com/</link><description>None</description><atom:link href="https://defensereview.disqus.com/chinese_armor_piercing_ap_sniper_rounds_and_xsapi_body_armor/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 02:51:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Chinese Armor-Piercing (AP) Sniper Rounds and XSAPI Body Armor</title><link>http://www.defensereview.com/chinese-armor-piercing-ap-sniper-rounds-and-xsapi-body-armor/#comment-3751465469</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Many years later, and we all know Dragon Skin doesn't work at all.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TomasEdwardChristian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2018 02:51:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chinese Armor-Piercing (AP) Sniper Rounds and XSAPI Body Armor</title><link>http://www.defensereview.com/chinese-armor-piercing-ap-sniper-rounds-and-xsapi-body-armor/#comment-258714936</link><description>&lt;p&gt;your "journalism" reads like an advertisement&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Abcd</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 10:57:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chinese Armor-Piercing (AP) Sniper Rounds and XSAPI Body Armor</title><link>http://www.defensereview.com/chinese-armor-piercing-ap-sniper-rounds-and-xsapi-body-armor/#comment-141472120</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hard armor is old news, the future is thixotropic... ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scooby</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 22:12:02 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>